Linda Grashoff's Photography Adventures

The Back Pond (August 2017)


September 29, 2017

The Back Pond at Schoepfle Garden has fascinated me for years. It’s where I have captured reflections of the surrounding woods in all seasons. This summer, however, the park people installed one of those terrible aerator rings, which shoots up water in a constant disruption of natural surface variations. When I visited last month, I was lucky enough to be there when the thing was turned off.

 

 

 

 

10 responses

  1. Just like looking through a certain type of glass – gentle distortion which is fascinating to look at in detail. I remember taking images so similar to these last Autumn and taking great joy in the experience. Gorgeous colours too, Linda

    Like

    September 29, 2017 at 3:47 AM

    • I think I remember photographs you posted of reflections in water—and thought they reminded me of mine. We can see so much more of what is happening with ripples when we stop their movement with the camera. Yes, great joy.

      Like

      September 29, 2017 at 5:23 PM

  2. After seeing these photos I decided to visited a pond here in Webster (Where life is worth living) I got some similar photos but not nearly as colorful or artistic as yours. Nice work!

    Like

    September 29, 2017 at 1:21 PM

    • That’s hard to believe, Ken. I assume you fooled around with the shutter speed. I thought it should always be 1/80th or 1/100th of a second. But apparently that’s only true for some ripples. I.e., my rule doesn’t always work.

      Like

      September 29, 2017 at 5:26 PM

  3. George Rogers

    Much-enjoyed moment of reflection.

    Like

    September 29, 2017 at 4:19 PM

  4. So pretty, and how aggravating that they installed the aerator, but I suppose it might be keeping the pond healthier. You do a beautiful job with reflections – and ripples!

    Like

    September 29, 2017 at 10:28 PM

    • Thanks, Lynn. I have to argue about the aerator, though. The pond is very small, maybe 30 by 60 feet, maybe even smaller. It supported blue-gill fish and frogs without a problem. Now the frogs are gone, and I imagine the blue gills are, too. I don’t think the pond is healthier for the aerator; it had plenty of oxygen before. Husband David suspects that the aerator was installed because “people like to see stuff squirted into the air.”

      Like

      September 30, 2017 at 3:35 PM

      • I hear you – I guess I was giving them the benefit of the doubt, but it sounds more like another “improvement” on what nature was doing just fine. So discouraging.

        Like

        September 30, 2017 at 9:41 PM

        • Well. I suppose I could give them the benefit of the doubt. But my biologist husband sees it my way, too, so I’m disinclined.

          Like

          October 1, 2017 at 11:33 AM

It's a pleasure to read your comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.